The Record / Articles / The issues

Guilty By Association: How Healthcare Practitioners Got Lumped In With the Fraudsters

When a clinician's credentials are the product being sold, why does the clinician get charged alongside the people who sold them?

By Evelyn Hernandez · First published on Justice and the Record, September 8, 2026

There is a kind of person in federal health care fraud cases who is almost never named as such: the practitioner whose credentials were the product being sold. Someone else built the marketing, ran the call center, bought the patient lists and submitted the claims. The clinician signed orders they were told were legitimate, for a fee that was a rounding error next to what the operation collected.

This article explains what changed around 2018, when enforcement shifted from complaints and informants to data mining for statistical outliers. That approach is effective at surfacing large schemes, and it is indifferent to why a number looks wrong.

The same outlier signal can come from a deliberate scheme, from a practitioner whose credentials were harvested, from a clinician hired for a narrow task whose signature was used downstream, from a billing error the clinician never made, or from good care Medicare simply does not cover. Once the signal exists, the case is built around the name attached to the provider number.

Key points

• Since about 2018, enforcement has been driven by statistical outlier data.
• An outlier flag cannot distinguish a schemer from a practitioner who was used.
• Cases get built around whoever's name is on the provider number.

Keep reading

← The full court record of Elizabeth Hernandez's case